Reply to Be heard about the local building norm changes to AAP Screening Pool

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Be heard about the local building norm changes to AAP Screening Pool"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]...[/quote]

This is odd and your AART sounds uninformed.  I wonder if they could have changed the policy about needing to have only one Cogat sub-section above the cut-off.  Maybe now it's the composite that needs to be in-pool?  I swear I saw this possibility referenced somewhere but don't recall where (maybe in the original equity report?). We are also at a Title I school but did receive an in-pool email.  That said, DC's composite was over 132.[/quote]

I thought having the composite over 132 was something that had been used in the past, and that may be where you remember it from. Brabrand's paragraph (and supporting 2 pager) did not specify which parts of which tests might be used - again the communication utterly lacking and this only in a document that was buried on BoardDocs.

I wonder if PP who was told no pool misunderstood? Our AART said when I asked about the pool in the level IV meeting that "no pool cut-off would be published."[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics