Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Feedback on lottery for K"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can you give an example of the woke stuff at ITS? [/quote] They're often talking and talking and talking about equity using all the modern terminology, but their actions just don't match up. Like today-- three half days more than what was already scheduled, and the school is paying so that families enrolled in YMCA aftercare can have free care. But everyone who's not enrolled in the aftercare (which costs way more than DCPS aftercare!) is just SOL and gets no help. They treat parents like everyone has a flexible job or SAHP, basically. And that's not equity. Soooo many of the families say all the woke stuff, but really they're at ITS to avoid the high-poverty, high-trauma environment of Ward 5 DCPS, and they know it. So it's really awkward.[/quote] Pretty much every liberal parent who is not sending their kid to their IB school (and staying in that feeder through HS) is living with this dissonance (myself included).[/quote] Yep, me too. At ITS there's no target language or educational philosophy to use as a fig leaf, so it's really kind of awkward. I did give our IB a real try so I don't feel too bad about it, but I'm happy to see the at-risk preference happening and hope that the school and parents will live up to their rhetoric.[/quote] What would it have taken to get you to stay in your IB school? [/quote] The main thing is a cohort of kids performing above grade level in upper elementary and especially in the feeder middle school. I just didn't want my kid to be working alone or on a computer so much of the time, and they weren't able to provide an age-appropriate grouping in other classrooms because the higher-grade kids weren't performing on grade level. I also wanted a much higher level of organization in general. ITS has its flaws but is generally organized and runs smoothly, the IB school really struggled with basics like communication. Cultural things like being consistent about outdoor play (even when it's "cold"), not feeing the kids so much sugar, too much TV. And there were significant behavior issues, not that ITS is completely free of them but it isn't as bad. Preschool parents are sometimes more tolerant or oblivious to behaviors if their child doesn't tell them about what happens, but an upper elementary kid will tell you exactly who punched who. I hope that the at-risk preference at ITS will bring more economic diversity to ITS and that ITS will still be able to maintain high academic performance and differentiate effectively. I have a lot of hope for our IB as it has made good strides lately, but it didn't happen in time for my DC's academic needs. I'm very fond of the IB school and donate and advocate for it, I don't think I'll ever love ITS as much as I loved the IB.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics