Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Amherst getting rid of legacy preference"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Amherst is the closest school to Ivies to go this route which is good. Athletics are still major funnel of rich white kids.[/quote] Athletics is also a major funnel for black kids. So what?[/quote] At schools with selective admissions, like Amherst, athletics is dominated by wealthy white students. The point is that if you’re going to get rid of legacy admissions you should be taking a hard look at athletic preferences because they’re probably even more skewed[/quote] You’re making the flawed assumption that white athletes are unqualified for admission. For the privileged crew or squash athletes it’s jus a finger on the scale. For the POC football or basketball player it’s a lifeline.[/quote] This is the lie you tell yourself to justify your advantage. The Harvard admissions data makes clear that athletic recruits are far below the normal academic qualifications of non athletes. If you think people in your school or your kids’ schools weren’t thinking you or they got into schools they didn’t “deserve” then I’d like some of the drugs you’re taking to warp reality. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics