Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "Weinfeld Education Group? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] OP here, THANK YOU! Wow, this is so helpful. I really appreciate your insight. Honestly, the only thing keeping me from sending this is that the school will just say they don’t have enough evidence of adverse educational impact. My son scored at 46% on his recent MAP test (below average but they didn’t think it was that bad) and he got Ps in K+1st and As and Bs last year- but what does that show especially during the pandemic last year. My son has developed coping strategies to “get by” but the private assessment clearly shows how much he struggles with the dyslexia. Not sure if we should just take the 504 for now. I HATE that the schools/MCPS attitude is to wait for my son to fail. This is so upsetting.[/quote] Re adverse impact - you do NOT have to prove adverse impact at this screening stage - merely make a showing that there is/could be. You have done that through below grade level testing, through your feedback on how difficult last year was and how much support you had to provide, etc. At a minimum, the school should have passed you on the screening and moved to a 60 day period where they would collect further data, which includes classroom data. Also re: adverse imapct. The school is saying that 46%île is average and thus does not show any adverse impact. That is only true if your DC’s IQ (or highest component of the IQ) is also around 46%. BUT, for a kid with an IQ at the 80th percentile, a 46th percentile reading score is actually bad. The school will always try to convince you that a kid has to be scoring “below average” or “borderline” to qualify. That just is not true. “Significant discrepancy” can qualify a kid for an IEP - significant discrepancy between IQ and achievement. My kid has an IQ in the 99th percentile and math reasoning scores in the 90th percentile but math fluency scores in the 40-50th percentile. That is such a significant discrepancy that he qualifies for a math calculator accommodation. He also has dysgraphia with writing scores from the 25-50 percentiles - again he qualifies for an IEP for SLD in writing even though he has never gotten below an A or B in an English class in his life. He has, however repeatedly done poorly on classroom writing assignments, although never below a C because he tries at least. He’s had an IEP since third grade. Only when he got to middle school and had to start taking the PARCC did he start failing the writing portion only of the PARCC. Don’t second guess yourself about what the school will say - so send it and let them say no a second time. You will be no worse off than you are now. You can still collect more data, or hire an advocate or get a lawyer. If you accept the 504 plan, make sure to document in writing that you disagree with the IEP decision and that your acceptance of the 504 plan does not constitute agreement to the IEP decision and does not waive your due process rights. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics