Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Schools are not even collecting vaccine info on kids so everyone goes home if ANY positive case?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The amount of crazy sh*t being posted on this thread is wild. Somebody REALLY wants to scare DCPS parents. Gross.[/quote] It's that flu bro mom that kept taunting me and taunting me "you don't even have science to support it! Give me the links, lady! You can't even have an informed conversation!" I promise I didn't even *want* to go dig out a 1982 Pediatrics study. It is crazy relevant, and I'm more scared than I was before I found it. [/quote] Let me get this straight. A 40-year old article you googled, that is a retrospective study of 8 cases, in a completely different setting than schools, with no information about time of exposures, ABOUT A TOTALLY DIFFERENT VIRUS ... is "crazy relevant" to 20-minute school lunches? More relevant than the CDC? More than the NYTimes? How about you just read this: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/29/well/family/back-to-school-covid.html [/quote] 1. I didn't google it, I searched PubMed, because you were taunting me to start a science fight. 2. you continue to use all caps for the fact that it's a different virus, but the CDC (citation linked above) has stated delta is as contagious as chicken pox, so a study of a chicken pox outbreak is relevant. 3. You're wildly unreasonable (uninformed? Intellectually dishonest? Who knows) to reject a a '40 year old' study published in Pediatrics. Air microbiology and the laws of physics haven't changed. 4. Um, yeah, more relevant that the NYTimes, which I love and respect.[/quote] You think this is a "science fight"? Ok. I have tried to get Jeff to delete your post as wildly speculative/verging on deliberately misleading, but looks like he hasn't gotten to it or does not want ot. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics