Reply to Is AU Park the next Bethesda?

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Is AU Park the next Bethesda? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Haha that  Johnny McDeveloper builds a house with “better construction” than a solid brick, plaster, slate, actual stone foundation house from 1930.

I think you meant “better open plan” [/quote]

DCUM is where middlebrows reign. While not all new houses represent improvements in technology, it’s clear that, inter alia, energy efficiency can be wildly better with new construction. [/quote]

Yeah but you’re comparing building an entirely new house to renovating an existing one. At that price point you can replace every window in an old house, rip open plaster walls and add modern insulation bats and replace wall with R-11+ drywall, and completely replace every system. And you will end up with better construction than these poorly built McCraftsman and McModernfarmhouses that well heeled yuppie couples can’t get enough of. [/quote]

Pshaw! Strawman (McStrawman???) arguments! It matters a lot *what* the particulars of the old houses are. AU Park is full of so-so houses from the 30s to 50s, some of which are poorly maintained. At some point, new energy efficient technologies will out compete these (obvious) retrofits that dazzle you, if they haven’t already. [/quote]

If you're worried about anything other than cost, it's still better for the environment to improve efficiency on an existing house than it is to tear it down and replace it with new construction, even if your new house is LEED Platinum. [/quote]

At current assumptions, that's *mostly* true. But don't fool yourself by making it too categorical.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics