Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Is anyone following the Bethesda/Somerset/Westbrook boundary study?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I agree this is much to do about nothing. It shouldn't even increase class sizes instead just add a couple of classes to their spare capacity. Most of the other ares being considered to be pulled in are just as rich or richer too. Now if they only dump the apts that feed Somerset to Westbrook that would be targeted offloading even if it only raised Westbrook's FARMS rate to 3%. It isn't like we are talking about busing from silver spring. [/quote] We moved to Westbrook about 5 years ago. At the time, it was the *least* diverse school in all of Montgomery County, and while I haven't looked into it recently, I don't think much has changed. It would be make sense to move the S2 area (which includes those apartments) to Westbrook. It's contiguous, I am sure the ninth option, recently introduced, will garner a lot of support from Somerset and BES parents - it doesn't add anything to Somerset (other than the Brookdale neighborhood) or BES, just moves portions of each to Westbrook. But in doing so, it creates an elementary school district that stretches from the corner of the DC/MD line in Westmorland Hills to the intersection of East-West Highway and Connecticut. Some of the other options are even sillier than that. [b]To me, option 1 makes the most sense, and after that options 4/5. [/b] Here are he current options under consideration: http://gis.mcpsmd.org/boundarystudypdfs/BSW_OptionsRound2.pdf [/quote] I think Options 4 and 5 should be eliminated because they each leave BES more than 100 kids overcapacity within a couple years. That goes too far against the utilization factor. I think Options 1 and 8 are the ones coming closest to a reasonable compromise of all factors.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics