Reply to Burn Cain!! Slowly. And. Surely.

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Burn Cain!! Slowly. And. Surely."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=TheManWithAUsername][quote=Anonymous]Hey, look.  Don't blame me for the intentional ambiguity of your initial post.[/quote]
Hey, look. There's nothing ambiguous there to anyone who reads.

I quoted the prior post about "Clinton spermin'." You thought that could have been a reference to Vince Foster? This whole thread is about the allegations against Cain. You weren't confused by ambiguity; you wanted to bring up only the least substantial of the allegations, to suggest that they were all ridiculous as compared to the ones against Cain.

[quote=Anonymous]So you claim that the Paula Jones case had merit.  Fine.[/quote]
I don't just claim it; I really didn't follow it that closely. I know that it was brought to court, that it was not found frivolous, and that he settled it for a lot of money.

[quote=Anonymous]But frankly there's a bit of the story of the Boy Who Cried Wolf going on here.  If there are twenty women who come forward--along with claims of drug-dealing, and Hillary murdering Vince Foster--and every single one of these stories is sponsored by the same right-wing organizations, you'll have to excuse me if, after the 18th case, I begin to get a bit skeptical.[/quote]
So do I. I didn't question skepticism of that. I simply said that the allegations against Cain and Clinton are not incomparably different, in particular as it relates to consent.

[quote=Anonymous]The Cain charges were obviously brought by one of his opponents in the GOP primary.  The fact that Cain's gone up in the polls pretty much speaks volumes about your average GOP primary voter.[/quote]
A point I made very early in the related thread.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics