Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "White’s Ferry"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So everyone here is ok with someone using your property to run a business and not pay rent?[/quote] Because they had an agreement in place since 1952. And even that wasn't considered a new deal-[b] it formalized what had been going on for 100+ years, including since an 1871 condemnation of land for the purposes of establishing a landing at White's Ferry.[/b][/quote] This is interesting. I wonder why White's Ferry even entered an agreement at all in 1952? It seems that they already had adverse possession satisfied. I think the 1871 condemnation gives credence to the claims that White's Ferry SHOULD enjoy an adverse possession claim/easement to this very day. The 1952 agreement shouldn't even be valid if that small portion of the land was condemned. I think this is really a ploy by the farm owner to get Virginia to pony up big bucks for the land via eminent domain. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
