Reply to What’s the controversy with 1) Maggie Haberman; 2) Nate Silver and 3) Dionne Warwick?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "What’s the controversy with 1) Maggie Haberman; 2) Nate Silver and 3) Dionne Warwick?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] This. Feel free to criticize the nepotism that helped her get her job, but the people who think she's pro-Trump are waaaaay off base.[/quote]

She comes across a little insufferable IMO. I wouldn't say she's pro-Trump but she has definitely carried water for the Trump admin on more than one occasion. She tweeted out the Hunter Biden story. She tweeted something the other day about Trump spending the remaining days of his "first term" golfing or something rather which I believe she deleted after she got ratio'd to hell. She's also annoying with her quote tweeting of other media persons/outlets saying "can confirm" etc. Like, thanks Mags, we were all on the edge of our seat waiting for your scoop. There's lots of other examples, thats why they call her MAGA Haberman on Twitter.[/quote]

[b]Good for her for tweeting the Hunter Biden story.[/b]   Just because there is a tsunami of corruption coming from the Trump administration doesn't mean we should ignore the puddles of corruption elsewhere.

And are you crazy enough to believe that she tweeted out Trump's "first term" golfing because she think he will get a second term?       Rather when you compare the amount of golfing that Trump did with, say Obama, you need to point out that Trump has had one term, and Obama had two.

And I am glad that she tweets out confirmation.       The more confirmations a story has, the more likely I am to believe it.

Maggie Haberman is hero of American journalism.

[/quote]

You mean the cockamamie laptop story so full of far fetched conspiracy that no other media outlet besides the New York Post would touch with a ten foot pole? So brave.[/quote]

The widespread attempts to censor it are what made doing it brave. It shouldn’t have been, but it was.

-Habermen hater[/quote]

The media is not obligated to report on baseless accusations. Funny how that story miraculously disappeared after Election Day, just like the marauding caravans after the midterms. [/quote]

Haberman pointed out the many flaws in the story

Maggie Haberman
@maggieNYT
Things that are sketchy in NYP story on Hunter Biden - why wasn’t this in Ron Johnson report if it’s been in possession for awhile? When did Giuliani acquire it? Giuliani has been everywhere on the but this has been kicking around since late last year and unreleased till now?[/quote]

Yes, but she added those comments in follow up tweets after getting roasted when she initially retweeted it from the NY Post. She could have provided her comments without retweeting the story which only served to amplify it, unproven allegations be damned.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics