Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "David Krucoff, developer w/ ties to Republicans, opposes DC statehood: running vs. E Holmes Norton"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Krucoff really got pummeled in the election. [img]https://i.ibb.co/GcYjnDr/F2-C89-D7-F-825-E-4-C23-8704-8-DAF80-BD5275.jpg[/img] Finished 7th in an eight-person field, losing to every other party’s candidate INCLUDING the libertarian candidate. Krucoff lost to everyone but John “Recovery” Cheeks who has a laudable platform except he opposes statehood because it “would cost too much money”. It’s tough for Krucoff to do so poorly, because 3 of the other candidates had zero signs that I saw driving to all the city wards — and 2 had almost zero. Krucoff made a sign effort. Krucoff barely got 2x the votes of that well-known candidate, “Write-In”. Republicans used to run for delegate against Holmes Norton and say falsely they were for statehood ... but only with a constitutional amendment, which they know would never happen. The new trick by Krucoff is to run against statehood. That worked out ... extremely poorly.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
