Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Lucy Calkins admits she was wrong - stop using this outdated method to teach reading"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have 4 kids and my last one had no phonics. She is now in middle school. She did great with reading and was a voracious reader in elementary school so she personally enjoyed the approach. But she never had a spelling test since first grade and her spelling is behind. Vocabulary was also considered wrong to teach and I’m surprised how behind her vocabulary was compare to her siblings even though she read far more. She is a bright kid so making up the gap now that vocabulary is back We had many friends who taught phonics on the side as the reading method didn’t work. I’m just wondering what group of kids really did well on all fronts - reading, vocabulary, and spelling. [/quote] The kids who are taught phonics, given spelling tests, and told to look up words they don’t know. That’s your answer. It’s how most of us were taught in school.[/quote] And how lots of Catholic schools still teach.[/quote] Secular private schools, too — thank god. [/quote] Yes, they teach the old school way - memorization, using a dictionary, etc. It "worked" for generations and generations (including us DCUMers), BUT the difference it now public schools mainstream SN kids. These kids don't have the mental bandwidth, executive function, the attention span, or whatever other hinderance to do things like memorize, study for a test, sit still long enough to learn the mechanics of grammar (identify a predicate nominative), or master long division. So public school moved the goal posts and leveled the playing field and started using cherry-picked curricula so that learning was "easier". That is why public school (FCPS comes to mind) doesn't use textbooks. There is no textbook that covers their wonky, all over the place, and hard to follow curriculum. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics