Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "Nest level lacrosse: girls"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I am sincerely curious what BLC years people are referring to when comparing with NL. Everyone knows that BLC has an excellent 2027 team, but the rest of their girls teams are generally equivalent to NL girls teams at those age levels. And that is despite the fact that BLC has a massively larger recruiting area, as well as better marketing and name recognition. My DD plays NL and her team has not lost to their BLC equivalent in a couple years, although each time it is very close. Haven't lost to Pride Red either in both tournaments and box. And to be frank, MC Elite at that year is a definite step down in quality from NL, BLC and Pride. I will concur with the qualms about both conditioning and quality of coaching at NL. They just are not as well drilled as other teams from outside DMV. However, it also means that they don't have an a-hole on the sidelines and frankly I feel embarrassed for other parents and other teams when their coaches are red-faced, yelling, a-holes. BLC seems to be doing much better on recruiting coaches who also coach at private schools, which I think in the end will make a difference and probably the arc of history will be in their favor. Particularly since they have a significantly larger recruiting area. And also, NL losing their indoor facility really diminishes their #1 comparative advantage.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics