Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "Age 35 Isn’t a Fertility Cliff. Why Do We Think It Is?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]/\ PP here. I'm sorry to hear that. And yes, exactly. Close to half of infertility cases are unexplained, so something like normal AMH results would be false reassurance that everything is okay. [/quote] I don't know, though. I hear what you're saying, and I'm another one with unexplained infertility, but I think there certainly are women who'd benefit from early testing and learning about issues that might be addressed if caught in time. I'm not sure if the fact that the results wouldn't be a slam-dunk for everyone doesn't mean it wouldn't be worth doing since it could still help a lot of people, especially as we continue to learn more about fertility and develop increasingly better treatments. And even just knowing at a younger age so one could start making financial plans for treatment or coming to terms with the fact that they aren't likely to ever have their own biological child would be helpful to plenty of people IMO.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
