Reply to BLM nuclear family goal

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "BLM nuclear family goal"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes but what does the word salad of:

"We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

in the OP actual mean in a practical sense?  Is there some policy goal that could work towards this?  If so, what is it?[/quote]

A friend of mine, who is black, recently posted on social media about adoption, and the criticism that the Black community receives for not adopting more children in need. She said we need to realize that black women/families regularly take in children in need and care for them as one of their own, outside of the legal adoption process. Sometimes temporarily, sometimes permanently. She said so many black kids have a sibling or cousin who is not a blood relative. This is the village that they refer to. 5

Today in wapo there was an article about an 88 year old DC man whose father was born into slavery. That’s how close we are to slavery and the fact that women and children and men were sold away from their families and had to form communities to help one another.[/quotel]
So it's a sign of poverty. Why are they calling for it again?
Should we all be brought down to their level?[/quote]

What's ignored these days is the black family unit was quite strong up until the 1960s and then for some reason it started falling apart and out of wedlock pregnancies soared. Keep in mind this followed the Civil Rights movement. It's one of the paradoxes that people have struggled to understand. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics