Reply to Got the MD Board of Education absentee ballot today. Who will be least likely to raise taxes?

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Got the MD Board of Education absentee ballot today. Who will be least likely to raise taxes?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Austin is for fiscal accountability and community voice in decision making.  He wants excellent education for all.  This is possible still being fiscally responsible by more closely finding how money is spent and data informed outcomes. He will listen to the voices of communities of parents, teachers, and students. [/quote]
Please explain how he will create " excellent education for all" in terms of overcrowded schools?

He doesn't want to look at adjacent clusters when redrawing boundaries, which means we have to build more. So, how does he think MCPS will afford to address over crowded schools with the limited budget?  And of course now they have to also spend time and money on dealing with the lawsuit that *he* in involved in.

Please explain Austin's plan for how he will address over crowding in our schools?  And also, please explain why he doesn't want neighborhood schools, but rather the status quo?  Let's recall that some 30 to 40% of students do not attend their closest school.[/quote]

Austin posted this on Twitter today:

"Not many students are actually eligible to be moved for capacity if we stick to adjacencies. I’ve been saying this all along, but here’s the data summary on my numbers:"

https://twitter.com/Stephen_Austin_/status/1262020682516508672

Based on his computations, derived from the WXY report, moving students to adjacent schools won't solve the overcrowding issue.[/quote]

Isn't that sweet? Steve Austin is using data from the WXY report [b]he opposed[/b]. I guess it's turned out to be useful after all! How about that?

It's a weak argument, anyway. Just because boundary changes wouldn't ameliorate all overcrowding problems, doesn't mean we shouldn't do it where it would.[/quote]

I see nothing wrong with that. It's the most recent data, why not use it if it's there?

I opposed certain roadway projects, but they were built anyway, and I'll use it if it's there.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics