Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "40% of Williams' classes are athletic recruits"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am not trying to denigrate other professions -- teaching, for one. I cited those professions as examples of paths not taken by the majority of kids from top colleges, and particularly athletes from top colleges. There is, apparently, a network that has developed to assist Ivy League athletes in getting jobs on Wall Street (see http://www.metro.us/newyork/national/article/642506--ivy-league-mafia-pipeline-to-wall-st-for-college-athletes) Some 60% of Princeton's recent graduates work in finance. I don't think our country or economy benefits when our top universities churn out hedge fund managers and investment bankers instead of physicists, teachers, or engineers. [/quote] Hmm . . . if your stat on Princeton is correct, though, you should keep in mind that 60% of Princeton students are not recruited athletes, so there are plenty of non-athletes going into finance as well. I agree that it's disturbing to see so many kids go into a single field, but I don't think that can be attributed to sports participation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics