Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Bowser proposes to add over 1,500 new affordable housing units to "Rock Creek West""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote]Actually, there are ZERO affordable units for rent in Colonial Village, District of Columbia. — B[i]owser's 100% single family neighborhood has no low-income apartments — including along 16th St NW. [/i] [snip] The map shows her little swath at the top of the drawing will not be affected by her plan [/snip] … Colonial Village/North Portal Estates/Shepherd Park are all zoned for the same schools (Shepherd/Deal/Wilson), have the same neighborhood associations, etc., and are really all considered part of "greater" Shepherd Park. The border is Georgia Ave. to the east, which already has zoning laws which permit multi-unit housing. Currently, it's lined with a bunch of (mostly shabby) apt. buildings. [snip] There will also be affordable housing in the Walter Reed development, just to the south of the neighborhood, once it gets underway. There were plans for a mixed use building on the corner of Georgia/Alaska/Kalmia which was to be a midrise apt. building with a Harris Teeter- [/snip].[/quote] 1st PP here. I appreciate what you're saying, SP poster, but the thing is, you're not actually describing Bowser's immediate environs. She's totally insulated from her own proposal to build hundreds of units for low-income people. The fact that there are apartment buildings 1.5 - 2 miles away on Georgia is irrelevant. Personally, I wasn't affected at my 20015 address by the units proposed for the MPD station on Idaho Ave NW. Easy for me to say that's a great place to house the homeless in a "rich" neighborhood — I won't know the difference in my day-to-day life. When upper 16th St NW gets a few hundred rental units built on some of those huge SFH lots between, say, Primrose and Myrtle (along transit! Yay!) …. then let's talk. No reason they can't tear down 2-3 of those homes and up-zone those parcels to multi-unit, right? Let's see Muriel put some skin in the game along the Gold Coast. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics