Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Diet, Nutrition & Weight Loss
Reply to "Is it really not calories in that matters?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I 100% believe it is calorie in and calories out. I failed to lose weight for years because I couldn't admit that while I ate a "healthy" diet I was simply eating too much. People underestimate how many calories they consume and over estimate calories they burn. The reason people lose weight when they cut carbs isn't because carbs are bad or make you fat but because they eat less calories. It's very easy to over eat the white stuff much more difficult to overeat broccoli. Now if you could manage to eat 4000cal/day of broccoli then you would gain weight from broccoli. [/quote] I totally agree.[/quote] The leading soda company paid researchers to come up for this conclusion. Lower carb people eat more calories and lose weight. Personally I eat more calories mostly good fats and lose weight.[/quote] Nah. I don’t think any of defy the law of thermodynamics [/quote] [b]It's not a matter of thermodynamics but of biology[/b] -- hormones, insulin, etc. and how they react to the food we eat and the regulation of blood sugar and fat tissue. All calories are not the same and sugar and white flour are particularly fattening, increasing glucose and insulin and leading to storing more fat. And, once you have excess fat and insulin resistance, your body thinks you need food even when you don't, making you hungry and overeat and/or feel sluggish and low energy so you move less. Read "How we Get Fat" by Taubes. So, eliminate sweets, minimize bread/grains. Make sure every meal is satisfying with a good amount of protein/fat so you remain satiated and can space out your meals. This allows your insulin to drop after the meal so your body switches to releasing fat from the cells rather than just running on glucose. For some people extended fasting works. For me, I feel awful when I try that but feel good and have been slowly losing weight by sticking with three meals per day, sometimes one afternoon snack of fruit+nuts or cheese if I know I have to eat dinner late. The calories in-calories out fallacy is propped up by the sugar industry that funds biased research to try to make the case that sugar isn't bad for you. They are wrong. And, no long-term trials have shown improvement in weight or reduction in heart attacks by eating a low-fat diet. [/quote] None of what you wrote addresses the fundamental fact that if you eat fewer calories than your body burns you lose weight. This has been demonstrated repeatedly by lab studies -- most notably with the Minnesota starvation experiment. Lots of things impact how a specific individual metabolizes food and how much energy they get from that food as well as how much people eat. None of those things impact the fundamental science that chemical reactions which break down sugar or fat or protein need to happen in order for an organism to stay alive and move around. If less fuel comes in than is required for metabolism+movement, the organism will consume stored fat and eventually muscle mass in order to survive. Then it will die. That's basic science.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics