Reply to Shady Grove Shared Risk Contract

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "Shady Grove Shared Risk Contract"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] I don't remember why we did all inclusive in the end, it might have had to do with the pgs testing being included in refund if it didn't work (not sure, you might want to check). Anyhow, we had great success with first donor, I am 21 weeks with first transfer and have 4 other dogs normal on ice.
I have a friend who has gone thru process with me and she got two normals and first FET failed, so if next does as well, she will need a second donor. Coincidentally,  we have severe MFI, and her husband has no issues, so that didn't play a huge role.
I have heard of lots of first time successes and lots of two, three, four donor situations. Two would have likely been my limit.[/quote]

interesting, thats not addressed in the chart... i will check. we definitely will want to do pgs testing; i know a donor will likely be fine but i have been through several miscarriages already and I would prefer to reduce the chances of that happening. i thought the pgs was non-refundable in both, hence trying to weigh $31.5k vs $38.5k. otoh, re-reading it looks like the *donor fixed costs* may not be refunded in the non-inclusive option. aka, if this fails, we would get $33.5k back from inclusive, vs no more than $19k back from the non-inclusive one. in which case, mathematically it becomes more about which is more likely to occur: take home a baby from the first donor, or not take home a baby at all? fascinating.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics