Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Pete Buttigieg & Stacey Abrams 2020"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why is a preachy mayor of an irrelevant city the subject of so much interest? Elizabeth “Liz” Warren is our next president, folks.[/quote] nope If she's on the ticket as the lead, you'll see more third party votes. I'll head third party or I'll vote R if Turmp's not the candidate.[/quote] NP. I understand that. However—- why is Buttigieg/abrams (in this proposed scenario) more palatable to you than Warren?[/quote] That duo isn't my choice either. I was just addressing the Warren part. sorry Abrams has no name recognition (agree with a PP). And while I like Mayor Pete, he'd make a better VP. He's very cerebral, which I like, but his critical thinking is best used toward mediation. I like his idea of recreating a vision, pulling from both sides. But we need someone who will hit the ground running, as no one is waiting around to redesign a vision for the US while action is necessary now. Both need to be done in tandem, however. I think a moderate like Klobuchar, with Buttigieg as VP, would work well. She's not willing to throw out the baby with the bath water, and she's young enough to put in some years. But as a lifelong D, the fact that I'm willing to vote for an R who's NOT Trump says loads b/c it makes me question who the Ds currently are. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics