Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "NYT article - DCUM board menttioned"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Look, put 2 and 2 together. 1) College admissions are becoming increasingly competitive. 2) UMC parents have proven themselves capable of going so far as to *give up guardianship of their children* to gain college advantages 2) ADHD is increasingly over-diagnosed 4) Wealthy suburbs show disproportionate percentages of 504s with testing accommodations = zero question that 504s are being abused to get kids more time on the ACT/SAT than they deserve There may be some parents (some on this thread even) who naively don't believe they fit this scenario, because they can't accept that the SAT/ACT by nature are supposed to test processing speed and focus, so they think their kid with slow processing speed and reduced focus deserves extra time.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
