Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Susan Collins is in trouble"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She stood on principle when she voted for Kavanaugh. Read Justice on Trial.[/quote] What principle? SMH[/quote] The principle that one is always innocent until proven guilty - remember that one? I only wish I lived in Maine so I could vote for her. -DP[/quote] +1 [/quote] That’s in the criminal justice system. Not necessarily for job interviews. Why is this so compliforcated for you people?[/quote] It's not complicated for me. It's the way I think we should approach any situation involving a person--whether rumors, interviews, school-related infractions of rules, possible crimes, etc. Won't be the same as a court of law, but give the benefit of the doubt. And definitely with a situation where the accuser can't provide key facts.[/quote] But the person's behavior [i]during the job interview[/i] is immaterial to you, it seems. Somehow.[/quote] It's been repeated countless times, and the court of public opinion is clearly divided re his behavior. I'm one of the ones who thinks [b]his response was justified[/b]. You and I will not be in agreement.[/quote] And oh so dignifed. How far we have fallen from what is dignified.[/quote] PP here. I don't expect people to respond "with dignity" when accused of rape, near rape, and almost murder without more evidence. I doubt I would either, and I'm viewed as a pretty mature, calm person. [/quote] Justice Stevens thought his responses and behavior at the hearings were enough to disqualify him. I'll take Justice Stevens wisdom and knowledge about such things over yours any day. And I also would guess you'd never in a million years be qualified to sit on the Supreme Court, so your response to such inquiry is immaterial.[/quote] Justice Stevens had NO CLUE what he had been up against. He had no clue at the threats he and his family had received. He had no clue about the organized effort to defeat his nomination by leftist groups and Democrats. He just had no clue. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics