Reply to Weingarten/Manteuffel

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Weingarten/Manteuffel"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am disappointed by him too.  He always wrote about Rachel as a mentor/mentee type of relationship, so cliche and downright disappointing of him.

I remember he used to bring up a "rule" that he made up about dating age gaps.  That a man could only date someone no less than 7 years older than his oldest child/oldest daughter.  Something like that?  Whatever it was, I doubt 35/67 makes the cut!  [/quote]

From yesterday's chat:
Q: Significant other
Gene, several years ago you published a formula for calculating the minimum age for a prospective significant other relative to your age and your kids's ages, to prevent creepiness. I don't remember the details. How well does your current relationship fit?

A: Gene Weingarten
I don't make the cut.

Speaking of cut, we're ending now.  Thank you all.  Next week, same time and place.

----------
So, maybe he's a creeper but at least he's not a hypocrite about his previous opinion?[/quote]

Yeah, but he's a coward for running away immediately after that question.

So not a hypocrite, but a creepy coward.[/quote]
He didn't have to post the question at all.  Or put the relationship out there for public consumption at all in the first place.  So not completely a coward.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics