Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Man Accused of Raping Girl Was Working ‘Unauthorized’ at Montgomery Schools"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]A complete disgrace. I am so embarrassed to have a child in MCPS. I wish I could move or afford private. This is getting very scary. [/quote] MCPS had a contract with Towson-based Oak Contracting. Oak Contracting was contractually obligated to submit background check information about their employees to MCPS before allowing their employees to work on MCPS property. But they didn't do what their contract required them to do. Also, it's not clear that there is any connection between his work and the rape. So blaming MCPS for this is, at best, premature.[/quote] I think MCPS should audit their contractors on a routine basis. It's hard to audit them all, but at least the larger ones. Or just require them to submit backgroudn check paperwork on each person on the job.[/quote] Why not require MCPS contractors to wear ID badges to show they provided a background check to MCPS? No MCPS badge then no work at a location with students. School security should monitor contractors for badges. The real problem, same for MCPS employees, is that background checks only shows someone has a clean record at the time of the check. A person can later be arrested for a serious crime. How long would it take for MCPS to find out? I blame MCPS for being complacent because clearly this person had a record dealing drugs so he should not be at a school site. To say that the contractor was responsible still shows that MCPS is failing to check up on its contractors. The contract should be terminated and MCPS should stop using Oak Contracting for future projects as a penalty. However, the "may" clause for terminating the contract means MCPS will never enforce it. Let's face it, safety is not a priority for the administrators who run MCPS. [/quote] + 1,000,000[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics