Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Thoughts about Richard Montgomery HS?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] And to clarify more, it was related to a math error on calculating percentages of students on FARMS in each of the possible boundary scenarios. This is made clear in the updated superintendent recommendation letter which can be found online. The data absolutely DID NOT include the above mentioned projects and MCPS officials specified during the BoE meetings that those developments were not included in the projections. You can go into the transcripts of the BoE meetings if you don't want to take my word for it.[/quote] I don't know about the Bayard Rustin boundary study, but at one of the meetings for the Clarksburg/NW/SV boundary study last week, MCPS staff specified that the approved developments [i]are[/i] included in the projections.[/quote] Approved developments are always under projected. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
