Reply to UMC parents in low income schools

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "UMC parents in low income schools"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]What I have seen, is in schools with a high (over 65%) Spanish speaking population, there is NO PTA. Why is this? Because you could have all the translators in the world and they are not going to participate. I am not trying to sound racist here. What I have seen are parents living below the poverty line and struggling to put food on the table, much less run a PTA meeting.[/quote]

I agree but has anyone considered that maybe the PTA is not a good thing to have in the first place? Poor people shouldn't be forced to join it if they want to engage.

The solution is not having a PTA and finding other ways to build community and parent engagement without a PTA in low income schools. A PTA that is run by a small number of white people advocating for their needs over the majority of parents that are not involved in their PTA is not OK. The solution isn't to strong arm the poor parents into participating in the PTA but to make sure that the PTA has zero influence and there are other avenues for parental engagement. [/quote]

And who is going to do that?  What are the “other avenues for parental engagement”?  Is the principal supposed to do it?  If parents do it, then there is some kind of parent group.  Whether it is associated with the MD PTA or whether it is some other kind of PTO seems kind of irrelevant.  Either the administration has to do it or the parents have to do it, and I’m not sure why doing it through the PTA structure is inherently worse than having to invent an alternative structure.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics