Reply to Commander in Cheat

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Commander in Cheat"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm anti-Trump but don't gaf about how he plays golf.[/quote]

I'm pro-Trump and anyone with any sense would see constant negative stories like this are complete BS.[/quote]

...except for his lawyer, who wouldn't let him testify because he'd perjure himself.[/quote]

That's what the FBI was hoping for. And would have set up.[/quote]

An honest person wouldn't be "set-up-able."  Geez.[/quote]

Asking the same question in two different ways and it's pretty easy to "get" someone to 'lie'.

[/quote]

No, it's actually not.  In order to establish perjury, one of the elements you have to prove is intent.  When you have two statements framed two different ways that produce two somewhat different answers, that the answers are different isn't enough, you have to prove not only which one is false, but also that the person knowingly and intentionally made a false statement.  That the person told you the truth in response to a different version of the same question would actually undermine a perjury accusation because once someone has told you the truth about something, what motive is there to lie about it later?  The willingness to admit would directly undermine a showing of intent to lie.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics