Reply to 3 kids in 4 years

Forum Index » General Parenting Discussion

Reply to "3 kids in 4 years - bad idea?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have 4 in just under 5 years - no twins. We are terrorized now that they are all teens/college bound but I wouldn’t change it. Sure my body is shot but I see women everyday who are my age (45) and look the same and have less kids. Good body or more kids?  Is that even a real question?[/quote]

Does it really have to be one or the other? I had two under two and my body is exactly back to what it was pre pregnancy. I worked hard for it and obviously genetics help. Planning for baby 3 now but don’t think it will be any easier or harder to lose the weight this time around. [/quote]

Maybe, maybe not. I found my third pregnancy much harder than my first two. I was running throughout first two, and could only really walk during my third and wore a support belt the whole time. I expressed my shock to my care providers and they really just shrugged and said, “well, it’s your third. It gets harder on your body.” So maybe your genetics will make it easy for your third too, but I wouldn’t be too cocky about it before you’re even pregnant with #3.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics