Reply to Tulsi Gabbard 2020

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Tulsi Gabbard 2020"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The gay rights stuff is concerning, but the complaints about her meeting Assad are totally ignorant and uniformed. Gabbard is the only Dem in the field who actually wants to place limits on US wars abroad. Vast majority of "progressive" democrats are just totally in the dark about foreign policy and war. [/quote]

No. She did a totally unauthorized trip and refuses to condemn him. It is very concerning. [/quote]

Do you understand what her actual position on military intervention is? Or do you get all your foreign policy positions from Twitter?[/quote]

You need to simmer down. I think she is highly problematic and will not vote for her. Her position on gay rights is awful and her inability to condemn Assad is nuts. Her military position of not intervening is not the issue.  I WILL NOT VOTE FOR HER. If it comes down to Trump v her, I would sit out. Both are terrible. The Democratic Party can and needs to do better.  [/quote]

Ok, I see you are a other progressive with a shallow and totally uniformed understanding of foreign policy. [/quote]

People like you are insufferable and why the Democrats have such a hard time winning elections. [/quote]

People like you are why 100s of thousands of innocent civilians are killed by US bombs and starvation in Yemen, while you are fixated by whatever images of dead children in Syria on your FB feed, all the while you feel smug and virtuous about the MLK sign in your yard.

[/quote]

You are nuts. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics