Reply to Best return on investment: nanny, private elementary/middle/high school, or private college

Forum Index » Money and Finances

Reply to "Best return on investment: nanny, private elementary/middle/high school, or private college"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think your best money spent will be on one parent staying home FT until school starts.[/quote]

Disagree.  I think the most crucial time for one parent to be at home is when your child is in middle school.  Their peers have become far more influential then; their hormones are going crazy; and those are the years that they can get into really bad stuff.  Being present is essential then.[/quote]
I don't understand this point.  If the teen is in middle school and has afterschool activities (sports, etc), then why is it important for a parent to be home?  That's a bit extreme.  You just need at least one parent to get home at a resonable time to have dinner, help with homework, etc.  Also, I doubt that one parent can just SAH for those few years.[/quote]

The parent should be home when their child gets home from school.  I guess you could over-schedule the child and have them do sports, etc. every single afternoon.  But then you are ceding the parenting to others - the neighbor who drives them to their next activity, the school after care program coordinator, etc.  And since you are barely there in your child's life, why do you think that he or she will confide in you when you are around?  My sister, the SAHM, has twice been the first to learn of her dd's friends' sexual activity - before their own parents.  Why?  Because she is the one who is there for them to confide in.

As for your last statement, why should it be any harder for one parent to SAH those few years than it is for one to SAH for the first few years?

[/quote]

You can work without overscheduling your child. This is really reaching. If you don't want or need a career that's fine but many of us aren't ready to retire in our late 30s once our kids reach school age. You can't really pretend to even think you will go back after several years in your 50s. It's fine if people don't want to and don't need to work. [b]But saying it is not an option if you want to be present for your child is BS.[/b]  Quit stating your opinion as if it's an definitive fact. We are all in the real world and we all know parents who work with kids in school and parent who don't - it's a mixed bag how their kids are navigating through those tough teen years and not totally dependent on working vs. SAH.[/quote]

If you read carefully, the argument is not that you can't work while your child is in middle school - just that a parent should be home when the child gets home from school.  How is that inconsistent with having a career?  The only argument was that it is more important to be there for them in adolescence than toddlerhood.[/quote]

How many careers let you work only until 3 pm each day?[/quote]

Teleworking, flexible hours - there are many options.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics