Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Luther Jackson MS Enrollment Plunges as Expected "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]"Luther Jackson Enrollment PLUNGES As Expected" I can't help think that you are trying to bait people into an argument with your dramatic word choice. It was expected -- and INTENDED -- that LJMS's enrollment would in fact drop when kids were required to move over to another MS. And kids were going to be required to move OUT of LJMS because it was overcrowded! Your whole issue is that you wanted more of the poor kids moved out of LJMS. And the decision didn't go your way. But, let's not forget that the whole point of rezoning is to effect a reduction in enrollment at the school that is overcrowded. Somebody had to be moved out. And on the corollary -- somebody had to be moved over to TMS. There was a school that was far undercapacity next to a school that was far overcapacity. 300-ish kids from the over-capacity school had to move out. Which kids? You had two groups -- those who are part of Oakton HS and those who are part of Falls Church. It wouldn't make any sense to take 300 Falls Church kids out of LJMS and send them to TMS. At the base of this rezoning decision was the need to remove 300 kids from LJMS. The answer given was: the kids who are not in this pyramid long term. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics