Reply to Subject Test Scores

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Subject Test Scores"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]OP:  He is FINE!

SAT Subject test takers are highly selective so do not get hung up on the % tile (ie, kids that are good with English/History but not as high on the STEM subjects probably would not take Math II kind of selective).  Just FYI my DC got 800 on one of the SAT Subject and that put him at 80th%.

Anything over 700 looks fine ... and honestly, with all the schools requiring SAT/ACT, I don't think improvement in 20-50 points is going to tip the scale one way or another.  Had he gotten below 680 it might be a different story.  But his scores are fine.[/quote][/b]

OP ignore the people saying you are humblebragging. You have a right to be concerned about the 710.  I'm assuming your DS is applying to schools with an expressed interest in the sciences - hence she took Math II and chemistry.  I'll tell you my DD's story and you can extrapolate from it what you want.  DD wanted aerospace at Princeton so applied SCEA and for the programs EA at Ga Tech and Purdue.  Got into[b] the latter EA and other name tech schools for aerospace engineering.  Got deferred at Princeton.  Valedictorian of class.  4.0++++ GPA.  35 ACT.  National awards.  We got bum advice about the SAT subject matter tests so DD took Math I and Chemistry.  DD also took a college course in chemistry at a community college the summer before and got an A.  Also private tutoring for the chemistry subject matter test.  If I remember correctly she scored a 730 or 740 on the Math I and the chemistry test.  She went back (her own volition) and took the Math II test and chemistry again.  We were told by a number of tutors that the chemistry exam covers an enormous quantity of information so even the college level course on chem wouldn't necessarily help with the chem score because the field is so vast.  On retake, she was still in the 740s/750s.  She did not get into Princeton. Contrary to what others will scream at you, if you have a friend on the faculty who is going to bat for your kid you can find out what the problem is with the application (other than being caucasian from a boring zip code that they don't need) and her problem was the low SAT II scores.  And she's not a URM and doesn't play the xylophone.  So yes, 710 is a problem if DD is applying to study in the field at an Ivy.  I would send in the 790 and not the 710 if you can do that.  [b]By the way, schools that say SAT IIs are not required "but highly recommended" means in real language that you are competing against superlative international candidates with 800s on every conceivable test.  The only reason they don't "require" them is because to do so discriminates against the less knowledgeable and poorer applicants.  But if you are not a URM, lower income and come from a good public or good private, you need to supply them.  Some are posting here that schools are moving towards not requiring test scores.  That is not a reflection of what is going on in terms of selecting students in the admissions office - they still want to see top scores - what that movement is about is increasing the number of applicants so that the University can reject them, thereby driving down the selectivity scores for reporting to the ranking services[/b].[/quote]

This was our experience too.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics