Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Laura Ingalls Wilder"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Laura’s books are mostly non-fiction— accounting events as she experienced & remembered them (with some changes to things like the timeline, I realize). So should she have lied or omitted the parts about some townspeople hating “Indians” and her mother fearing them? Would it be better to leave out the part with everyone in blackface & pretend it never happened? These were HER experiences. It would truly be whitewashing history for her to have left out the ugly parts & prevailing white attitudes & actions of the time. I read all these books to my kids & explained the historical context, that some things are complicated, and that some behavior in the book is of course very wrong. I realize people aren’t trying to ban the book, but the award renaming implies Wilder & her books are are, which is what I’m addressing here. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics