Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "Randomized, controlled, peer-reviewed studies of OT efficacy?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can anyone point me to any randomized, controlled, peer-reviewed studies showing that occupational therapy is effective in treating sensory processing problems or fine motor delays in preschoolers? I work in research but can't seem to find these. Most of the studies I've located do not have research designs that enable observers to distinguish the effects of treatment from changes that would have occurred in children regardless as they matured. Are methodologically rigorous studies out there? If there aren't, and you decided to go ahead and spend the money on OT, how did you make that decision? It seems like a ton of money to spend without being more sure about efficacy, but maybe worth doing because OT at least isn't harmful, and might help even if it hasn't been studied properly? TIA. [/quote] You search PubMed and narrow by population. However, you're over thinking. If your preschooler has fine motor delays then OT is pretty much all you can do.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics