Reply to Parents take 30 year old son to court to evict him from their house

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Parents take 30 year old son to court to evict him from their house"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Getting back to the original topic, after reading some new articles, it seems like the reason the parents want the loser son out of their house is so they can have visitation with their grandchild (his child).  Apparently, he is not allowed to see his child alone, and can only visit with his child in a "supervised, therapeutic" environment.  Therefore, their grandchild cannot come to their house while he is present.

Makes you wonder what the full story is - why he is not allowed unsupervised visits with his kid.

[/quote]

Oh man, this story has serious danger written all over it. [/quote]

The "grown" son seems stunted, overly vigilant and unstable - plus, weapons.  Bad combination, all around.  He is being kept away for good reason.

The poor small child, at least he has his mother and grandparents.  The grandparents should find themselves a condo at an undisclosed location. Done.  They need to do (essentially) what the mother of his child did - distance themselves.  A lot. [/quote]

To add, the :grown" son seems overly entitled and stunted - another bad combination. But the weapons make distance a must.[/quote]

New article here with some new info:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/30-year-ordered-vacate-parents-home-claims-harassed/story?id=55372570

Rotondo, who plans to appeal the decision, said he stopped speaking to his parents when they "alluded" to wanting him to leave the house in October, just one month after he lost custody and visitation rights of his son.

"I'm not bothering them by living here," Michael Rotondo said in an interview with ABC News' "Good Morning America." "It's little to no cost to them, and considering how much they've harassed me, I think it's the least that they should be required to do, which is just let me hang here a bit longer and use their hot water and electricity."

By the end of October, Michael Rotondo said his parents were demanding he get a full-time job, health insurance and sessions with a therapist, but he said he "didn't need any of those things."

"My parents alluded to the fact that they no longer wanted me living in the house, and I was devastated from the loss, and not seeing my son anymore," Rotondo said. "After that, I was like, 'I’m done with you guys.'"

Mark and Christina Rotondo said they gave their son multiple notices to vacate and even offered him money to help him find a place of his own.

Michael Rotondo admitted that he accepted the money, but used it for "other things."

"I took it but with consideration for my plans, and how my finances interacted with those plans, I did use the money for other things, but I don’t regret that," he said. "I would have preferred to have kept the money and given it back to them ... but I had to use it, and that's just how it is."

"Me and my father recently tried to occupy the same space at the same time ... so I said 'excuse me,' and he said, 'I will not excuse you, Michael,’” he said "He's just trying to stir something up so that he could get me to say something. It's my overwhelming belief that he’s trying to make it so that he could try and call the police or something to support his case."

He said he was shocked by the ruling and that he couldn't believe the judge would "make it so that these people can just throw me out instead of letting me stay here."

I'm afraid this is going to end badly.  The parents will likely need protection from him, just like the court deemed his child did. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics