Reply to Is it dishonest to use insurance payout for something else?

Forum Index » Money and Finances

Reply to "Is it dishonest to use insurance payout for something else?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why do people ask dumb questions like this?!

The Insurance company insured an event.  The event happened and the company paid out per the terms of the agreement.  It's upto the owner to do what he pleases with the proceeds.  Why is that difficult to understand?

[/quote]

It's not dumb because as was pointed out, the answer is different if the car is paid off vs if it is financed. [/quote]
There is no clause in a typical finance agreement that forces the repair. I never repaired any cosmetic damage on mine, only made it drivable.[/quote]

It's not in the finance agreement. The financing institution is typically listed as a loss payee on your car insurance. So while they may not have found out about it, you were supposed to get it repaired because you are not the owner, they are. And that's their money. [/quote]

The bank isn't the owner of the car if you financed it, the car is collateral on the loan if you don't pay it. As long as you pay the car loan, why does the bank care if the car has a scratch on it? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics