Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "RIP Johnson's -- Now let's move on"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]AU doesn't own any of the buildings that have the fast express food in the neighborhood. Not one of them. And if you read the letter posted on the neighborhood listserve, it becomes pretty clear that AU wasn't the bad guy in the Johnson's issue. [/quote] Good riddance to Johnson's. [/quote] AU had me until the last line about market rate rents. They are simply too high for many business. Since AU can set the rest as landlord, then yes I guess I guess I do expect them to subsidize a few neighborhood institutions to a degree. As a fellow neighborhood institution I feel they should take this one for the team. [/quote] The concept of "market rate rents" is that the market sets them, not the landlord. [/quote] Uh, we don't have rent price floors in this country. AU is basically acknowledging that it seeks highest and best rent from the property, even if that means the departure of a business that has been serving the local community for decades. By this logic, AU will want to develop the property, and the result will be more pseudo-urban generic retail and fast casual dining. Oh, and certainly we could use another big CVS between Idaho Ave. and Brandywine. :lol: [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics