Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Tired of Name Changes/Bad Planning - Vote NO on School Bonds"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Other names will follow, and they'll cost even more money (let's see how much FCPS tries to bury in the capital budget), plus the projects they actually want to find are, for the most part, bad choices that will delay other capital projects that are needed and will aggravate demographic disparities within FCPS. So it's time to vote NO and tell FCPS we're tired of their BS. [/quote] Agree. Poor stewardship of taxpayers' funds. The whole name change debacle should never have happened. They could have dropped the Jeb and eliminated anything that said Jeb over years at no cost. Had they done this at the beginning of this whole name change process (two years ago), Jeb would have pretty much disappeared by now and the costs would have been almost nil. Instead, I'm betting that some purchases over the last two years have gone to "Jeb" included signs, uniforms, etc.[/quote] Then vote no and STFU. People who can see beyond the single issue know that there are schools in dire need of renovation. Also, if this name change turns out to be expensive because none of the loudmouth supporters put their money where their mouth is, then the SB will have hard numbers to point to when new proposals come up. Do we really need to keep rehashing the Stuart name change for another two or more years. Just move on, and if it's an expensive debacle, be front and center with the numbers when someone proposes another name change. Simple. Stop tying everything to it. If you object to the capital expenditures the bonds are supposed to cover, that's different. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics