Reply to School Integration in Manhattan piece in the Atlantic

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "School Integration in Manhattan piece in the Atlantic"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]one of the messages of pieces like this, even if it isn't a direct point, is that choice isn't really an effective outlet for poor families, who have residential and transportation mobility problems that richer parents can get past. and ultimately there is no choice-based solution for the segregated, majority-shunned location-tied schools (and their non-choosing populations) other than closure, perhaps with a new school entering the same building.

I leave it to smarter people than me to say whether taking the same non-choice population and giving them to a charter operator generates better results. My sense is no.[/quote]
Except in DC the charter sector actually has a slightly larger percentage of economically disadvantaged students enrolled than does DCPS.

DCPS has a larger enrollment of ELLs and a very slim margin in number of students with disabilities.

So here many poor families are exercising choice.

http://www.dcpcsb.org/facts-and-figures-student-demographics
[/quote]
ok.... but - look at the Equity Reports and it is clear that 90 of the 115 charters are almost exclusively economically disadvantaged.  for the 15-25 that aren't, those are the ones that the mid to high SES families are aiming for.  so, just because the charter system has more low SES than DCPS, that doesn't mean that it is more integrated.  it actually shows that the charter system is doing worse at economic integration than is DCPS.

if anything, it is amplifying the economic segregation because families with means are applying for the same 10-15 schools and, each year, the percent disadvantaged decreases.  as soon as a school is in demand, the mid to high SES families will be applying en masse.  the result is that a disproportionate amount of students in that school will be mid to high SES, and a low SES kid has less chance of benefitting from that school - even if they live in close proximity.

the charter system is basically supplying a discounted private option to mid-high SES families.  I've heard of an in-demand charter raising close to $200k for a playground in one night - Creative Minds.  Not that hard given 80% is mid-high SES.

the system needs to be rethought.    [/quote]

Seems like nothing could be more unfair and more segregated than DCPS and its neighborhood based boundaries.[/quote]

Inversely, it isn't necessarily "fair" that the lottery system provides an advantage to families that can transport their children to their location of choice - assuming that they 'win' the lottery.

If economic diversity is actually important to the charter system, then charters should have a specific mandate to provide enrollment preference to disadvantaged families within proximity to the schools.  Of course, schools like YY, CMI, and the new MV are locating in areas where it is difficult for poor families to access.  The result ends up the same as DCPS boundaries.[/quote]

If you want lower SES children to attend high performing charters, then why aren't you advocating for charters to have access to closed DCPS facilities (which, by definition, are easily accessible - being as they are, schools).  DCPS doesn't WANT competition from charters and therefore the charters are forced into facilities at market rates - which by definition are NOT convenient.

Then how are you surprised when only parents with means and options can get to them?

Open the 1.5 million sq. feet of closed schools to charters:  then you'll see charters offering programming to children in easily accessible facilities.  Until then, it's [u]not their fault if they can afford[/u] to compete against the developers.[/quote]

Should have read "CAN'T".  As in "it's not their fault if they CAN'T afford to compete against the developers" (for metro-accessible and convenient buildings - the sort of locations which make great condos).[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics