Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Admission to SLACs after TJ"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There are a total of 9. And that is not counting those who were rejected due to not having high enough GPA and the expected liberal arts classes. TJs history courses are minimal language tough to fit in, English geared towards technical writing etc etc. OP you are trying to make TJ something it is emphatically not. Maybe it was 10-20 years ago but not now or likely in the future with STEM so popular. You are putting your student in an awkward if not impossible position. It's very hurtful to the student. And so much time wasted on very tough STEM courses which are much harder than they need to be for a liberal arts student. [/quote] What "expected liberal arts classes" are TJ students missing? We just went through the college admission process this year with several top SLACs. Once my child showed interest in a school, he was "heavily recruited" (for lack of a better term) as a STEM student and not once did anyone mention a lack of a liberal arts education. He's taking AP Lit this year and the class is significantly more challenging than the version that's taught at our top NOVA base school. The curriculum at TJ does not hurt a student's chance of admission at a SLAC. I just looked up our base school admissions to some SLACs. Yes, PP, you're right, specifically for Davidson it looks like that would be easier to get into than at TJ - it's also much more popular. However, for other top SLACs there's only 1-2 admissions over the last 3 years - and the base school has a much larger graduating class than TJ. In the end this goes back to a theme that runs through all of these TJ discussions: a kid should not go to TJ with the intention of getting into a "top" college, he/she should go there because they want to be challenged, have opportunities in STEM that they wouldn't have elsewhere, and go to school with equally motivated students. Maybe my kid's a unicorn - he loved all the STEM opportunities at TJ, but he also loved the class discussions in his history classes with his bright, engaged classmates, as well as reading Dostoyevsky and Toni Morrison. I know he would've been bored out of his mind at our base school. And now he's probably going to a SLAC where he can double-major in something like math and philosophy. Maybe OP's kid is the same type of kid. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics