Reply to RES disagree on diagnoses

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "RES disagree on diagnoses"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Given that only one doctor suspects immune issues and others (including Cornell, which is a leader in the field of IVF) don't think immune issues are at play, why not listen to the majority of doctors? You haven't mentioned finances, but if I were you I would either do the two cycle package at SG or go to Cornell. It seems like your eggs aren't great based on your stats and your response to the stims for the IUIs so I don't see a reason to suspect immune issues at this point. At 38, it is much more likely to be your age/egg quality (sorry).[/quote]

OP here. Yes, I agree that what you're saying could be a good approach but the other issue is the IVF protocol type.  The Drs. also differ in which protocol they think would be best for me with standard IVF.  Shady Grove says long lupron and says they would not recommend estrogen priming.  Cornell disagrees and says estrogen priming.  GW also agrees with Cornell.  Dominion did not recommend natural cycle IVF.  That also makes it hard to decide what to do.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics