Reply to Ohio heartbeat law

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Ohio heartbeat law"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
All SCOTUS needs to do is overturn its prior decision in Roe v. Wade, which falsely determined that unwritten "penumbras" in the amendments you listed provide a right to privacy.

SCOTUS could also easily conclude that the constitution applies to the unborn and that laws allowing them to be murdered are unconstitutional. This would ban abortion in all 50 states.  [/quote]

There is now over 40 years of legal precedent and decision making that protects not only the privacy mentioned above, but also establishes that the unborn are not "persons" with constitutional protections.

[/quote]

Which would only take one SCOTUS decision to overturn. [/quote]

So what happens to the 30-40% of fertilized eggs that miscarry naturally under this brave new precedent? [/quote]

Well, if the woman did anything the court decided could have jeopardized the pregnancy, she could go to jail.  This has already happened.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics