Reply to ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "ICE Shooting in Minneapolis "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It is tragic she died.  But she and her wife were out there to disrupt ICE as much as possible.  I am not sure what compels anyone to actually provoke a team of federal officials who are clearly armed.

Protest?  Sure.  Vote against the politicians implementing the policies? Sure.

But interjecting and engaging the officers literally; that (at best) gets you arrested - at worst dead.

Neither of those outcomes are worth the risk.[/quote]

+1[/quote]

Why did you make me hit you?[/quote]

Do you ever take personal responsibility for any of your decisions and their outcomes?[/quote]
Does ICE ever take responsibility for any of its decisions and their outcomes? No, they just lie about them.[/quote]

You're no different if you don't believe in taking personal responsibility for your decisions and actions. [/quote]

Do you think you’re actually making a point, here?

No one makes a decision to get shot in the face.  People DO make decisions to SHOOT SOMEONE in the face.  Do you really not understand the difference?[/quote]

You don't seem to understand that [b]consequences occur for decisions and actions[/b]. I'm not saying it's fair, but it's life. Not everyone is nice, kind, and caring. [/quote]

DP. Yep. And when you kill someone through officer-created exigency and outside the scope of justification, there are consequences. Ask Chauvin about that. [/quote]
+1 And they’re doing it over and over again, in violation of a 9-0 decision from this Supreme Court last year (Barnes v Felix)

[twitter]https://x.com/motherjones/status/2010154748087787975?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote]
It’s almost like people shouldn’t be interfering with federal agents doing their jobs (something legal to do) by trying to intimidate, block, or ram them with their cars (something illegal to do). No adult with a functioning IQ and sense of accountability is moved that entitled, violent, idiots voluntarily put themselves in harms way because they don’t like that laws of this country are being enforced. We don’t care if they are “mommies” who care more about sticking it to Trump more than their own children as they abandon them to play revolutionary.[/quote]

FYI, the defense attorney won't be making your whiny arguments.[/quote]

The defense attorney is going to have a field day going through her voluminous violent and unhinged texts and emails.  [/quote]

Would you like to share with us under what theory of law and evidence those texts and emails would become relevant and admissible in a trial of the agent's actions? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics