Reply to ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "ICE Shooting in Minneapolis "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]FYI, the defense attorney won't be making your whiny arguments.[/quote]

The defense attorney will win because he will have all of the evidence and a jury will never decide unanimously to convict based on that evidence.[/quote]

When the prosecutor shows the jury that Ross was not in front of the car at the time he fired the first shot, his defense attorney will have a hard time explaining why it was reasonable to fear for his life.

His defense attorney will also have to explain why, even if he was in front of the car, Barnes v. Felix does not apply.  To refresh your recollection, Barnes was a 9-0 US Supreme Court decision rendered in 2025 that stands for the proposition that an officer may not intentionally or recklessly place himself in a situation that causes him to fear for his life and then subsequently claim the use of deadly force was justified.  Barnes specifically involved an officer who stepped in front of a vehicle.  There is NO dispute that Ross stepped in front of the vehicle.

[twitter]https://x.com/ryangrim/status/2010009389869019224?s=20[/twitter][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics