Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]is there any kind of meaningful difference in, say, a FARMS rate of 45% versus a FARMS rate of 55%? Is there some tipping point that yields the best outcomes for low income kids?[/quote] [b]20-25% is tipping point. [/b]RM cluster went through boundary change some time back and some one had research done on by MIT or some univ like that. BOE student member was the one who paid attention to that research at that time. 45% or 55% makes no differece. That's my recollection. I am in RM cluster but not the RM parent you guys are citing.[/quote] Then I like the idea of having 20% seats for FARMS in Whitman and CHurchill by magnet like voluntary bussing to allow as many as FARMS kids in 20% FARMS school enviornment, [/quote] I don’t know how many takers you will get. Many FARMS kids are offered magnet spots in CES and middle school and it is my understanding that folks often turn down the offers, preferring somewhere closer to home with families they know in their home communities. [/quote] Presumably they won’t have a choice in long bus rides under option 3, it that’s what is necessary to help them. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics