Reply to ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]2011 girls with a weak turnout as far as quality goes. Don’t see that team improving much at all. CW will have to be involved if that team has any chance next year. Probably the team with the least benefit from merging with Brave across the board.  Outside of the goal keeper, not sure if they should be changing anything.  Otherwise, they’re trading better existing players for weaker ones.  [/quote]

VA Union beat Brave 4-1 this season and several BRYC/VYS girls tried out for Union but didn't make it last year.  Brave was the backup option for Mclean girls last year and none took their offers there but picked Union.  LO is the head coach for next year and will have control of the roster... CW is not the kind of person who will push to have all his players beyond telling LO who his top selections are.  He is too passive and would rather just go along. CW is the assistant coach so this is going to be a LO/MV in the background team according to Brave parents.

There are maybe 4-5 Brave players to add including the goalie but the rest of LO's picks are going to make the team weaker.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics