Reply to Trump’s Dementia

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump’s Dementia "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump had another mental health episode and spiraled out of control on social media last night:
12:18am - Demands Chuck Schumer resign 12:19am - Posts a tweet saying Obama tried to “overthrow the government in 2016.” 12:22am - Reposts a statement from Sen. Mike Lee calling for the filibuster to be removed 12:27am - Posts a conspiracy video alleging Obama and Hillary Clinton committed treason 12:27am - Posts a tweet from a MAGA account calling for Obama and Clinton to be arrested for treason
12:28am - Another post calling for treason charges against Obama and Clinton 12:28am - Yet another post demanding treason charges for Obama and Clinton 12:29am - Posts an AI image of a man holding a sign 1:13am - Demands the 2020 election be “wiped from the books and be of no further force or effect.” 2:43am - Posts about Clint Eastwood complimenting him 2:44am - Posts about Elon Musk calling the Southern Poverty Law Center a “scam” 2:45am - Posts about a far-right podcast

And it continued [/quote]

I'm sorry, but I burst out laughing when I got to the Clint Eastwood part.  It's like definitional delusional boomer dementia.  It's not funny, I know.[/quote]

I suggest some of you read the news:

He has no love lost with Schumer and what Schumer said about ICE was nasty. If he said the same about Israel, Y’all would be cheering him on. Read what Tusli Gabbard has been declassifying  and talking about lately regarding the 2016 Russia scandal. Time will tell. Eastwood has had some nice things to say about Trump. SPLC is in a heap of trouble for sure.  Nothing Trump says here is dementia - it’s all reported news, though news y’all hate to hear so….dementia.[/quote]

A fact‑based look at the claims shows the PP is relying on deflection rather than evidence.

But we can go into those deflections: Schumer’s past remarks about ICE were political criticism of specific enforcement policies, and he uses rhetoric about "shame" with ICE but nothing Schumer said was actually false.  Invoking Schumer does nothing to address the issues of Trump's evident signs of dementia.

As for Tulsi Gabbard, she is clearly and willfully spinning a distorted narrative.  While she highlights FBI procedural errors, [b]multiple official investigations including the Republican‑led Senate Intelligence Committee and the DOJ Inspector General [/b][b]confirmed[/b] [b]that Russia interfered in 2016 and that[/b] [b]the FBI had legal grounds to open the inquiry[/b]. That is well documented fact that does not go away regardless of Gabbard's gaslighting, yet the PP's framing omits these findings entirely.

And the claim that the SPLC is "in trouble" for paying informants is unsupported; paying informants is legal, widely used by law enforcement and journalists, and there is no actuual evidence of SPLC of criminal wrongdoing to support the indictment.

The PP's rhetorical pattern here is clear: instead of addressing the original topic of Trump's dementia, the commenter substitutes irrelevant grievances, whataboutism, and topic‑shifting. None of the points raised: Schumer, Gabbard, SPLC, Eastwood - rebut anything about Trump’s failing cognitive state. They function as distraction tactics, not rebuttals.

Sorry, but reality‑based discussion requires engaging with the claim directly, not burying it under unrelated political talking points.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics