Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]The Baldoni calling Blake sexy is not a strong claim for SH. There are now multiple documents showing Sony wanted more sex scenes, wanted more heat, wanted reshoots because Blake had not lost the baby weight. They wanted in R rating. They wanted to give audiences what they were expecting from the book, which is packed with sex scenes. The Sony exec Ange’s main feedback was that the movie did not have a compelling reason for audiences to believe that Blake’s character would have stayed with Justin’s character after the abuse. She said they needed to show passion etc because that makes it plausible lily would have ignored the red flags and stayed with him. Otherwise, the audience just wouldn’t accept it. It was good feedback but the point is there were multiple people other than Justin putting pressure for it to be sexier. Blake and Jenny themselves use that word so for justin to use it and all of a sudden it be SH falls flat. If Blake did not want to do a movie with these kinds of scenes she should not have signed on. Maybe if she had read the book she would’ve known better. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics