Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Eleanor the Great is on Netflix. Another Wayfarer & Sony collaboration with scarjo as director and Justin as EP. Seems like everyone managed to get on just fine once you removed one person from the equation. As Steve Sarowitz said, “everyone’s nice, and then there’s Blake.”[/quote]

Even Justin wouldn't stoop to leering at a 90-year-old and calling her sexy.[/quote]

You’re a contemptible a-hole on a few levels. [/quote]

I think PP meant his a-holery at least has some limits, aka respect for elders. At least I'm hoping Squibb wouldn't be among the TEN women who went on the record about his series of offensive behaviors. [/quote]

At least half of those women had nothing to do with Blake, and went on the record independently. But the Justin stans have no answer for why they would do that except, maybe just maybe, he is a sexist creep who enjoys exerting power over women. I wish I could wipe my memory clean of how he discussed a *teenage sex scene* with that poor young actress. Glad Blake succeeded in getting some of the more prurient, unauthorized scenes scrubbed.[/quote]

No one cares about the other women because none of their allegations have any substance.  Meanwhile, Blake’s claims fall apart by the hour.[/quote]

Right. That many claims about hostile work environment do not come out of nowhere. I bet you consider yourself a feminist, which is a joke. The fact that no one from that set, or the prior one with complaints, is going on the record to defend him speaks VOLUMES. [/quote]

The fact that the complaints are not limited to the IEWU set is important for establishing a pattern. No one can claim Blake's undue influence in the former case. Complaints about Justin necessitating his removal from another set are highly relevant.[/quote]

Heath testified under oath that Baldoni was not removed from another set.  I believe that Claire wrote in his affidavit that he raised his voice, which is not sexual harassment[/quote]

Baldoni raising his voice with other women (Claire, Alex Saks) and admitting in an email apology to Alex Saks after one such occasion that he has been struggling with conflict with women, specifically, is relevant to whether what happened with Blake was sexual harassment and retaliation, though. It shows someone who struggles to work with women and listen to them. It shows a pattern of negative behavior towards women on sets, and supports Blake's assertion that Baldoni would not have done the things he did to/with her to a man.

I think a lot of people have the mistaken impression that sexual harassment is limited to hitting on a coworker or touching them inappropriately. Those things can definitely be sexual harassment, but so can showing someone explicit videos, making gender or sex-based comments, walking in on a colleague while they are undressed, etc., if the behavior is unwanted and makes the other person feel uncomfortable or makes it difficult for them to do their job. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics